Williams v. Anderson, 2017 UT App 91 (June 2, 2017)

The court of appeals held the district court erred in applying Utah R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) to exclude evidence of damages at trial.  The court concluded that the initial disclosure provided adequate notice of plaintiff’s method for computing damages because the disclosure indicated that plaintiff was entitled to 30% of the price of a company based upon his ownership interest.