APPELLATE HIGHLIGHTS

  • SEE ALL
  • CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS

Sleepy Holdings LLC v. Mountain W. Title, 2016 UT App 62 (Mar. 31, 2016)

Mar 31, 2016

Plaintiff attempted to serve two supplemental disclosures addressing damages and naming witnesses over a year after the discovery cutoff. The district court struck both disclosures. Affirming, the Court of Appeals held Utah R. Civ. P. 26(a) and 37(f) govern the sanction when a party fails to timely make or supplement an initial disclosure, as opposed to Rule 16.