APPELLATE HIGHLIGHTS

  • SEE ALL
  • CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS

Pipkin v. Acumen, 2020 UT App 111 (July 30, 2020)

Jul 30, 2020

The allegedly defamatory emails and social media posts at issue in this lawsuit critiqued the propriety of a Bylaw which allowed the Utah Republican Party to expel party members who made it onto the primary ballot via a signature-gathering route. The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants, concluding that the statements at issue were not capable of a defamatory meaning as a matter of law. Although the statements contained strong language that adoption of the Bylaw “flouts current election law,” “constitutes a class B misdemeanor,” and was “illegal,” in context, these statements were exaggerated commentary that no reasonable reader would understand to accuse the individual plaintiffs of criminal conduct for voting for the Bylaw.