Evans v. B&E Pace Inv. LLC, 2018 UT App 37 (Mar. 8, 2018).

In this interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s denial of two parties’ motions to amend that had been shortly after the close of fact discovery, before any expert discovery began, and before a trial date was in place.  The court held that all Rule 15(a) factors weighed in favor of amendment, and the district court had exceeded its discretion in denying the proposed amendments.