2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture v. Dos Lagos, LLC, 2016 UT App 89 (Apr. 28, 2016)
RADC was the successor coholder of the note that plaintiff Utah First had sued on. RADC had not been named as a plaintiff in the original complaint and was not added as a plaintiff until after the three-month statute of limitations had run. The court held that because the case involved a single note, the original complaint had provided the defendant-borrowers with sufficient notice to satisfy the rationale of Rule 15(c)’s relation-back provision.